
Operation Dudula’s anti-migrant actions at Johannesburg clinics raise serious legal, ethical, and constitutional questions. This article examines the human impact, legal framework, and political motivations behind the protests, while calling for people-first policies over populism.
Operation Dudula, an anti-migrant movement now registered as a political party, is once again under scrutiny for blocking access to public healthcare services for foreign nationals in Johannesburg. The group has stationed members at several public clinics in areas such as Hillbrow, Jeppe, Diepsloot, Rosettenville, Malvern, and Kensington, demanding that patients show proof of South African citizenship before receiving care.
These actions, critics argue, are in direct violation of South Africa’s Constitution and the right to healthcare enshrined in Section 27, which guarantees everyone — regardless of nationality — the right to basic healthcare and emergency services.
Who Is Operation Dudula?
Originally formed in 2021 in Soweto, Operation Dudula (meaning “to push out” in isiZulu) emerged in the wake of widespread anti-immigrant sentiment and riots. The group accuses foreign nationals — particularly undocumented migrants from other African countries — of straining public services, taking jobs, and increasing crime.
Since then, Dudula has transformed into a political party, participating in elections and organizing mass protests. Their tactics, however, have been labeled xenophobic by civil rights organizations and international observers, especially as they involve door-to-door checks, intimidation, and now, blocking healthcare access.
Recent Incidents in Johannesburg Clinics by Dudula
In the past month alone, several Johannesburg clinics have been the site of Operation Dudula protests:
- Jeppe Clinic: Dudula members separated patients by nationality, denying vaccinations to babies of immigrant mothers — a move condemned by human rights organizations.
- Hillbrow Clinic: Protesters demanded ID documents from everyone attempting to enter. Those without proof of South African citizenship were turned away, despite being in need of critical care.
- Diepsloot Clinic: People living with HIV were denied access to their antiretroviral treatments due to lack of documentation.
- Malvern and Rosettenville Clinics: New mothers, some still recovering from childbirth, were barred from postnatal check-ups. The protests disrupted operations and created panic among healthcare workers.
Legal and Constitutional Implications Of Dudula
According to Section 27 of South Africa’s Constitution, “everyone has the right to access healthcare services, including reproductive healthcare.” The Constitutional Court and Department of Health have reinforced this right in multiple rulings, stating that clinics may not refuse care to anyone based on nationality or legal status.
Moreover, blocking access to medical care can amount to a violation of both domestic laws and international human rights conventions, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which South Africa is a signatory.
The Human Impact

Foreign nationals — many of whom live in vulnerable conditions — rely heavily on public clinics for lifesaving services. For pregnant women, children, the elderly, and those with chronic conditions like diabetes or HIV, being turned away can have fatal consequences.
One Zimbabwean mother, speaking anonymously, shared: “They told me to go back to my country. But my baby was burning with fever. I had nowhere else to go. I cried in the street.”
Healthcare workers also face increased risk and stress. Some have been verbally abused or threatened by Dudula supporters for treating foreign patients, forcing several clinics to request additional police presence.
The South African government, through the Department of Health and Ministry of Home Affairs, has condemned the actions of Operation Dudula. They emphasized that no one should be denied access to healthcare due to nationality, especially when it involves children and emergency cases.
Civil society groups — including Section27, Lawyers for Human Rights, and Médecins Sans Frontières — have launched legal action and public awareness campaigns under the theme “People First, Not Populism.” Their stance is clear: public health must never be politicized.
Political Motivations and Populism
Operation Dudula’s actions are widely viewed as part of a broader populist strategy. By targeting migrants, they appeal to poor and working-class South Africans frustrated with unemployment, housing shortages, and failing public services.
Experts warn that scapegoating foreigners not only undermines constitutional democracy but distracts from the real causes of service delivery failures: corruption, mismanagement, and inequality.
Systemic Causes Behind Health Sector Strain
Blaming migrants ignores deeper systemic problems. South Africa’s public health system suffers from:
- Chronic underfunding
- Infrastructure collapse in rural and township clinics
- Shortages of trained staff
- Poor supply chain management
Foreign nationals make up a small portion of the healthcare burden, contrary to populist claims. Rather than excluding them, a stronger, more inclusive public health policy is needed.
A Path Forward: Human Dignity and Health Equity
To move forward, civil society advocates for:
- Legal enforcement of non-discrimination policies in all health institutions.
- Increased funding and reform of the public health system.
- Civic education to combat xenophobia and promote shared responsibility.
- Transparent dialogue between the government, communities, and migrants.
Conclusion: People Before Politics
The ongoing clinic blockades by Operation Dudula represent a dangerous turn in South African politics — one that threatens public health, legal rights, and social cohesion.
It is time for leadership — in government, communities, and civil society — to rise and reaffirm the founding values of South Africa’s democracy: human dignity, equality, and access to services for all.
The message is simple yet urgent: People First — Not Populism.
Further Reading:
- AllAfrica: “Patients Denied Care in Jeppe”
- Sowetan Live: “Foreign Nationals Blame Cops”
- Guardian UK: “Dudula Turns Political”
- Section27 Legal Briefs: www.section27.org.za
For more news please visit our website: africacapitalwatch.com