Kismayo, Somalia – The political standoff between Jubaland and the Somali federal government has intensified after a sharply worded response from Jubaland’s administration. The statement came in reaction to a late-night communique issued by Villa Somalia, which addressed the long-standing tensions and unrest in the Gedo region.
In its declaration, Jubaland firmly rejected what it described as “misleading and politically motivated claims” by federal authorities. Officials in Kismayo accused the central government of distorting facts about the Gedo situation and using inflammatory rhetoric that could worsen an already fragile security environment in southern Somalia.
Jubaland leaders emphasized that the root of the dispute lies in federal interference with regional governance and security arrangements. According to the statement, such actions undermine the federal system enshrined in Somalia’s constitution and risk alienating local communities whose trust is essential for lasting peace.
The Gedo region, strategically located in Somalia’s southwest and bordering Kenya, has been a focal point of political rivalry and security challenges for years. It remains contested both politically and militarily, with accusations of power consolidation by the central government clashing against Jubaland’s calls for greater autonomy and adherence to constitutional provisions.
Jubaland’s leadership urged the Somali federal government to prioritize dialogue over confrontation, warning that the continuation of political brinkmanship could destabilize not only Gedo but also broader state–federal relations. “Lasting peace in Somalia cannot be achieved through unilateral decisions or political pressure,” the statement read. “It requires mutual respect, legal frameworks, and inclusive consultation with all stakeholders.”
The federal government, meanwhile, has maintained that its involvement in Gedo is necessary to safeguard national unity and prevent external interference. However, critics argue that such justification risks inflaming tensions and alienating regional authorities who feel their constitutional rights are being eroded.
Broader Implications for Somali Politics
Analysts warn that the Gedo dispute is symptomatic of deeper governance challenges in Somalia, where the balance of power between Mogadishu and federal member states remains a point of friction. Without a clear mechanism to resolve such disputes, the risk of repeated political crises persists, undermining efforts toward national reconciliation and state-building.
Regional experts note that continued strain between Jubaland and the federal government could complicate security operations against al-Shabaab militants, who have historically exploited political divisions to expand their influence.
Conclusion
The escalating war of words between Jubaland and the Somali federal government over the Gedo conflict reflects the fragile nature of Somalia’s federal system. Resolving the dispute will require a shift from political posturing to genuine dialogue, with a focus on constitutional order, mutual respect, and the well-being of the Somali people. Without this, the risk of further instability looms large not only in Gedo but across the entire nation.
for more news : africacapitalwatch.com