On August 7, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order titled Improving Oversight of Federal Grantmaking, introducing sweeping changes to the way federal agencies distribute research funding and foreign assistance. Under this directive, senior political appointees not career experts are empowered to approve, monitor, and even terminate grant awards. While the stated purpose is to eliminate misuse of taxpayer dollars and align grants with national priorities, the reform significantly disrupts longstanding international partnerships, especially affecting African researchers, institutions, and communities.
New Political Gatekeepers: How the Process Shifts
The executive order mandates that each federal agency must appoint a high-level political official to oversee all funding opportunity announcements and grant decisions. The aim is to ensure that funded projects clearly reflect administration goals and “the national interest,” a shift confirmed across federal bodies including HHS, NIH, NSF, and FEMA . Furthermore, agencies are forbidden from issuing new grant openings until these political checks are fully in place
The order allows grants to be rescinded at any point if they no longer align with priority agendas or are deemed wasteful. It also enforces restrictions against funding projects that involve diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), gender identity studies, support for undocumented immigrants, or anything labeled as promoting “anti‑American values”
Implications for African Researchers and Institutions
U.S. federal agencies like NIH, NSF, and USAID have long funded vital research addressing malaria, HIV, maternal health, climate resilience, and social policy across Africa. Under the new regulation, such cooperative projects now face bureaucratic delays and heightened political scrutiny
Projects aimed at reducing inequality or empowering marginalized communities—often grounded in DEI or social justice lenses could be outright disqualified despite their proven impact The provision enabling arbitrary grant cancellation introduces instability in ongoing projects and deters long-term commitments.
Additionally, the requirement for “Gold Standard Science” and fiscal transparency may disadvantage African institutions, which may lack robust administrative infrastructure or advanced compliance systems compared to U.S. universities. As a result, smaller or less established organizations may be excluded, even if their work is crucial to local development.
Echoes of Broader Federal Realignment
This executive order is not an isolated move. Early 2025, a sweeping 90-day freeze halted almost all American foreign aid, with only limited humanitarian exceptions. That freeze disrupted development programs and emergency support around the globe, including critical health initiatives in Africa . Concurrently, Trump’s administration initiated downsizing efforts in agencies like the U.S. African Development Foundation, further affecting regional funding streams .
Risks and Opportunities Ahead
The political overhaul threatens to reverse decades of collaborative progress. Research continuity is at risk, institutional capacities may falter, and young scholars could be forced into underfunded paths or leave for more stable environments. Sustaining the scientific architecture of African universities may become a formidable challenge.
Yet, some provisions could inadvertently benefit underfunded centers. Simpler grant applications and efforts to broaden recipient pools might open new doors for organizations that were previously overlooked . Emphasizing cost-effective, measurable outcomes could also favor agile, community-driven projects with practical impact.
Strategic Responses for African Stakeholders
African researchers and institutions must strategically shift toward diversified funding avenues—European programs, private foundations, and South–South collaborations are vital alternatives. Crafting proposals that underscore shared global health benefits, scientific merit, and mutual interest could help navigate U.S. bureaucratic hurdles.
Investing in regional research alliances, strengthening administrative compliance, and developing robust documentation systems may improve eligibility under tighter U.S. grant conditions. At the global level, scientific organizations and funders should advocate for preserving objective, merit-based grant evaluation processes to ensure equitable international research collaboration.
Conclusion: Navigating Post-2025 Research Landscapes
President Trump’s August 7 executive order heralds a new, politically controlled era for U.S. research funding. While the stated goal is financial responsibility and alignment with national priorities, the directives politicize what has traditionally been a merit-based and scientifically driven process. The implications for African research ecosystems are profound posing risks to project continuity, funding equity, and academic independence.
In this new landscape, sustained cross-border research cooperation demands adaptability, resilience, and a collective push for integrity in scientific collaboration. African institutions must proactively diversify their funding base and fortify their institutional systems. Only then can the achievements of global research partnerships—once propelled by shared knowledge and mutual respect endure and flourish.
for more news visit our website africacapitalwatch.com